Camping Out & Wait For Rct3

Hey, i am new here but this is the fourm where we wait untill rct3 is relased!!! This week subject is what new rides are in this game? There is no wrong answers but you can talk about other things for youre life or just other things about rct3. Yeah and right now i am planing for my first rct3 park... WARNER BROTHERS STUDIOS HOLLYWOOD RESORT! If anyone wants to help me with ideas just reply!

Hey, i am new here but this is the fourm where we wait untill rct3 is relased!!

No, it's the forum where we say how many things RCT3 is currently missing and try to see if they fill that in. Also, it's not a forum to post pointless topics.

/me kicks coasteragent99

Anyway, ignore Mr Grumpy Jugding from pics ive seen RCT3 will have loads of rides including several of Vekoma prototpye rides which can be found on the site www.vekoma.com It also features an Adsoulutly Insane, kinda like a reverse bungee...not in the mood for explaining

ouch!

Anyways, RCT3 has a good amount of those rides, but... They'd better add that exploring feature that I annoyingly rant about all the time. It'd make the game so much better. But no, it's just ride the rides, blah blah blah.

[GRIM.657]

if they were smart they'd forget about a explorer feature and acc smoother ride and actully have normal looking supports... they only care about the fact that theres more rides, a night feature, and a fireworks thingy (witch i gotta admit is actully pretty cool) the era of rct/rct2 and fun ended with the release of WW and TT, and seeing that the same peeps are gonna be making rct3, i dont think it realy has a chance with those who recall the coolness and fun of the orignal rct and rct2. and i seriously doubt anyone has concidered how hard it is gonna be to hack that game, and add custom stuff? imagen rct2 with NO custom scenery and NO custom rides and No custom paths etc etc etc... coasteragent, how the heck would an 'exploring feature' improve the game? what the heck is it? a feature that lets you look @ the park better? i hope they add one too, then it will be easer to get around and look @ the parks, witch will make much clearer how pointless that game is!!!!! they're trying to make o once fun game into a pointless simulator/game combo, it cant get much stupider than that!

i have a task for you: look @ pics of sim themepark, and then look @ pics of rct3, witch is better? the corect answere is there the same! y are yall so excited about a sim themepark clone? here i was thinking yall hated that game, but now yall are all happy that they're cloning it! whats with yall! wake up! look @ how crappy this looks! how big-headed the peeps are, the trains only have 3 cars! the seatbelts on the wooden mine train dont work, the supports are so horrid, and look @ the transition between elemants, sim themepark is much smoother than that!

you dont beleve me? wait till it comes out. you will see the truth soon, and i will be here laughing @ yall for wasting 40 perfectly good $'s!


im soooo sick of this....

Sim theme park.(Well, the one I played for my playstation) had pixelated peeps. RCT3's peeps look a bit cartoonified but not extree...which is fine. Track types are realistic and I've noticed several new flat rides such as a Rock'n Tug, Zipper, Thrill Shot (Absolutely Insane ride..) and so on. I cant wait to try it out!

Simtheme park was so bad, don't even go there. I'm not saying RCT3 is going to be perfect though, I was just saying that it's absolutly NOTHING like simthemepark or whatever poop.

if they were smart they'd forget about a explorer feature and acc smoother ride and actully have normal looking supports...

If they were smart, they'd remember everything. If you were smart, you'd create custom supports! (sorry)

Anyways, the exploring feature is supposed to be just for fun, where you can take a break from coaster making and not jsut ride the rides, but explore your park loike a guest would. That's why HR was so fun, that feature really provided a park experience. I'm not saying that this is the only thing rct3 is missing, they're missing plenty, like catwalks for example. Anyways, I'm worn from arguing.

[GRIM.657]

If you were smart, you'd create custom supports!

if you were smart you would read what i said before, with a fully 3d game like rct3, it will be harder to make custom objects. plus, who's gonna hack the scenery type for rct2. im not that gr8 @ stuff like that, buggy is not makin stuff anymore, AE is not makin stuff anymore and doctor j isnt either.... so unless someone here hacks it, noone will, cuz the people @ sites like rcttown and rctmaster arent that gr8 with hacking, just good with making.....

You can still make custom supports. How will it be harder? If anything, it'll be easier, especially the 3d view.

Edit: you don't need custom scenery to make customs. Or you might, if Atari lies about saying that everything in RCT2 is going to be in RCT3.

[coolbeans326]

WTF? You guys haven't even played the game yet and your already saying how much it sucks. Its like judging a book by a cover, just cause it looks good on the outside doesn't mean its the best book in the world. Just because the graphics don't look like halo 2 doesn't mean its going to suck. Enjoy the game for what it is. If Chris did this all by himself, it would take years for him to finish, and then it would be really outdated. Anyways, the game looks great. I, presonally, thought the whole RCT 2 series sucked. And I really don't give a crap about the custom crap anyways. It just makes it look more realistic. But this game isn't about realism, its about managing a theme park. And the scenery they have is still enough to make you crap your pants from excitement. So shut up about how crappy the game is gonna be until you've tried it. Srry if I sound mean, but still, your rantings and carrying on are meaningless. The programmers aren't gonna say. Hey, look at GRIM's post, lets go take another year to re-do the supports just so he's happy. And lets make it so you can hack the program so people can put in high poly models so that way the game can lag like no other. Besides, how many of you would actually create any models for the game? Most of you don't do anything with NL or SM
ANyways, hey mysterio, welcome to the site. I'm don't normally post stuff like that, but you know, it gets to a certain point when you just want to strangle the makers of posts like that (tip: don't constantly post stupid stuff like that, its called spam, and people might start to get angry, like what I just did) Anyways, this post was pretty good, it wasn't pointless, it was optimistic, I believe is what you would call it. Umm also, pointless polls like: What's your favorite roller coaster, fav park, woody or steelie..... are old and stupid so don't post anything like that. Polls are more for well thought out questions that you have which strike your interest and sumthing you really want to know, not something that you do because your board. Hope I've give enough tips. Don't worry, I think you'll do ok on this site.[:D]

WTF? You guys haven't even played the game yet and your already saying how much it sucks.

Did I say it sucks? Sorry.

Most of you don't do anything with NL or SM

I do alot with it, nothing against your point though.

Anyways, You said you didn't care if it was realistic or not. If so, go play with simcoaster

I personnally have no complaints about the graphics. I just want them to fix up the problems that would make the game alot better.

[coolbeans326]

Anyways, You aid you didn't care if it was realistic or not. If so, go play with simcoaster

I have, and the game play sucks

Excactly. Everything about it sucks.

You didn't care if it was realistic though. And when it's unrealistic, that's the part of it that makes it suck.

[coolbeans326]

Originally posted by coasteragent99

Excactly. Everything about it sucks.

You didn't care if it was realistic though. And when it's unrealistic, that's the part of it that makes it suck.

no, that game, was by far the dumbest thing ever. The scenery sucked, you couldn't design like you can in RCT. And RCT series has its unrealisticisms. Usually you get way more people in a park then 2,000 or w/e, and roller coasters usually cost several million. Even though its unrealistic, its still fun, because you get to drown people and blow them up [:D] And some of the explosions are unrealistic. Same with the supports, but that doesn't bother me, like it seems to bother some of you.[;)]x50

But RCT actaully used coaster types, unlike the SC/STP poop.